One judge call vs twelve dimension scores

One direct Jev question per row against 12–14 Jev-scored dimensions with locally fitted weights on three classification tasks: 5,477 test rows, 25,174 Jev calls, $1.43. Decomposition wins on Japanese NLI (0.9076 vs 0.8373) but flags about 25× more hard benign rows as attacks (37.2% vs 1.5%).

Source: community catalog. Details and metrics reflect the published community snapshot and are not a performance endorsement.

Keep exploring

Similar to One judge call vs twelve dimension scores

Browse all
Japanese walkthrough of what Jev is and is not.
Articles & threads
DuckDB extension that classifies rows in CSV, Parquet, or DuckDB tables with Jev, about 10 seconds per 1,000 rows.
Test report using Jev to check each agent action first: most attacks caught, almost no false blocks.
Official
Choice, Score, and Noul: the three question types and what they return.
Official
Reproducible recipes: parallel questions, reranking, guardrails, citation checks, extraction, hierarchical classification.
awesome-jev (kydlikebtc) project preview
805 verified examples of Jev — TypeSafe AI's System One decision model — indexed by the decision each one makes, not the blog that mentioned it. Every cited call site is re-read by CI each week. Bilingual EN/中文, JSON schema, and a cross-platform compatibility table.
awesome-jev (kraayenjon) project preview
A curated list of Jev use cases, projects, SDKs, and resources. Jev is TypeSafe AI's System One model for fast, typed decisions in software — Choice, Score, and Noul with calibrated probabilities.
awesome-jev (Frank-ZY-Dou) project preview
Public examples of Jev used for robot control, 3D modeling and adjacent control tasks, with sources and archived media
Official interactive demo of speculative fan-out: many questions in one call, code keeps the relevant answers.