openpoke-meets-jev

Fork of OpenPoke where the yes/no decisions go to Jev instead of Claude Sonnet, with a same-inputs A/B against the replaced LLM decision and a 43,776-request adversarial run on the injection gate.

Open source implementation of Poke

How it uses Jev

claude-sonnet-4 jev-1.13.0 --- --- --- Latency, mean 2,452 ms 424 ms Latency, p50 / p95 2,512 / 2,883 ms 306 / 1,110 ms Input cost, 36 screens $0.1667 $0.0018 Input cost per 1,000 screens $4.63 $0.049 Distinct probabilities across 36 answers 6 18 Agreement at the 0.75 bar — 33 / 36

Source: community catalog. Details and metrics reflect the published community snapshot and are not a performance endorsement. Documentation details extracted from GitHub · the README.

Keep exploring

Similar to openpoke-meets-jev

Browse all
jev-aita project preview
Benchmarks & research
Benchmark of TypeSafe's Jev against Sonnet 5, GPT-5 nano and local LLMs on 770 Reddit AITA verdicts: Brier scores, latency and cost
jev-guardrails project preview
Benchmarks & research
Comparing LLM-as-judge vs TypeSafe Jev for agent guardrails: same rules, same agent, measured on cost, latency, calibration and coverage.
JEV-Paper-Radar project preview
Benchmarks & research
Let Jev read every new arXiv paper each morning and surface the few you should read. Plain-English interests, calibrated probabilities, ~$0.06/day, fork and go.
omp-typesafe project preview
Agent tooling
TypeSafe AI (Jev) adversarial reviewer and typesafe_ask tool for the omp coding agent
gpt-vs-jev project preview
Demos & playgrounds
Compare GPT generated language with JEV structured Noul decisions on the same input.
jevXagent project preview
Agent tooling
When Jev meets LLM — Transparent proxy that makes AI coding agents 3× faster and 80% cheaper. Cut response times from 2.4s to 890ms with Line J architecture.
Browser & computer use
A browser agent that turns a single goal into a sequence of lightning-fast actions.
DoomSat project preview
Games & simulations
F´ flight software → CCSDS/Yamcs → Open MCT, with jev (System One) and Claude Sonnet 5 (System Two) driving Doom over that real mission stack.
decisions-judge-mcp project preview
Agent tooling
Typed decisions for AI agents as an MCP tool: yes/no probability (noul), choice, and score in one fast request. Backed by the TypeSafe System One model.